Both help you see what AI costs per user. The difference is what they compare it with, what they cost, and where your data lives. Checked on 2026-11-02 from Weckr's public page; we make FiscaLLM, so tell us if anything about Weckr is out of date.
| FiscaLLM | Weckr | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI cost per user joined to real revenue: margin per user, plan and free trial | Hosted AI cost tracking per user with spending caps and runaway-loop alerts |
| Price | Free. Hosted with fair use (100,000 events per app per month), or self-hosted with no limit | Hobby free (50,000 requests a month), Pro $49 a month (1M requests a month) |
| Hosting | Hosted or self-hosted | Hosted |
| Open source | Yes, MIT (server, dashboard and SDKs) | SDKs are MIT; the service is hosted |
| Revenue used for margin | Real revenue from RevenueCat (one-click connect and import), Stripe (webhook and 12-month import, beta, USD), CSV upload, or a revenue API | Margin uses plan prices you set in the SDK; its site does not mention importing payments from Stripe or RevenueCat |
Pick Weckr if you want a hosted product and are happy to estimate revenue from plan prices rather than real payments.
Open the demo dashboard (sample data, no sign-up), read the docs, or start free. All comparisons: AI cost per user tools compared.
Yes. FiscaLLM is free and open source (MIT): use the hosted service at fiscallm.com or run your own copy. Weckr: Hobby free (50,000 requests a month), Pro $49 a month (1M requests a month).
Yes. FiscaLLM only needs one tracking call after each AI request and a revenue source, so it runs next to other tools.