Both help you see what AI costs per user. The difference is what they compare it with, what they cost, and where your data lives. Checked on 2026-11-02 from Helicone's public page; we make FiscaLLM, so tell us if anything about Helicone is out of date.
| FiscaLLM | Helicone | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI cost per user joined to real revenue: margin per user, plan and free trial | Open-source LLM observability through a gateway or proxy |
| Price | Free. Hosted with fair use (100,000 events per app per month), or self-hosted with no limit | Free tier; paid hosted plans |
| Hosting | Hosted or self-hosted | Hosted or self-hosted |
| Open source | Yes, MIT (server, dashboard and SDKs) | Yes |
| Revenue used for margin | Real revenue from RevenueCat (one-click connect and import), Stripe (webhook and 12-month import, beta, USD), CSV upload, or a revenue API | Tracks cost per user through request headers, but does not import subscription revenue to compute margin |
Pick Helicone if you want a gateway in front of your AI provider with logging and caching. FiscaLLM needs no proxy and adds revenue and margin per user.
Open the demo dashboard (sample data, no sign-up), read the docs, or start free. All comparisons: AI cost per user tools compared.
Yes. FiscaLLM is free and open source (MIT): use the hosted service at fiscallm.com or run your own copy. Helicone: Free tier; paid hosted plans.
Yes. FiscaLLM only needs one tracking call after each AI request and a revenue source, so it runs next to other tools.